Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. View Dana Remus’ profile on LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional community. Dana has 1 job listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Dana’s connections ...

    • The White House
  2. 6. Nov. 2023 · From 2021 to 2022, Dana Remus served as Assistant to the President and White House Counsel for President Biden, leading the administration’s efforts in confirming Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and advising on a range of policy initiatives. Prior to serving as White House counsel, she served as general counsel to the Biden-Harris campaign and general counsel of the Obama ...

  3. 15. Juni 2022 · Remus made diversity and rule of law top priorities Reums has worked with Biden for a while, serving as a top adviser in his campaign and, later, his chief lawyer. "I am immensely grateful for the service of Dana Remus, who has been an invaluable member of my senior staff for the past 3 years and helped reinstate a culture of adherence to the rule of law," Biden said in a statement on the ...

  4. 13. Nov. 2023 · WASHINGTON – Today, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) issued a subpoena to former White House Counsel Dana Remus to appear for a deposition related to President Joe Biden’s mishandling of classified documents. In addition, Chairman Comer is seeking transcribed interviews with four White House employees familiar with President Biden’s mishandling ...

  5. Dana Remus. Drawing on her prior experience in government service spanning multiple Administrations, Dana Remus advises clients on a full range of public policy issues, government regulatory enforcement trends, election and political law matters, congressional investigations, and civil and criminal white collar and investigations matters.

  6. Dana Remus and Frank Levy† We assess frequently-advanced arguments that automation will soon replace much of the work currently performed by lawyers. In doing so, we address three weaknesses in the existing literature: (i) an insufficient understanding of current and emerging legal technologies; (ii) an absence of data on how lawyers divide