Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
23. Jan. 2006 · Edmund Husserl's first book, Philosophie der Arithmetik, was published in 1891. The first English translation of this book, by Professor Dallas Willard, appears in the volume under review here, Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901. Also included in the volume is Husserl's ...
9.2.10 Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic (c. 300 BCE) 165 9.3 Some famous open problems 167 9.3.1 Riemann hypothesis 167 9.3.2 The twin prime conjecture 167 9.3.3 Goldbach’s conjecture 168 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82602-0 - An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mathematics Mark Colyvan Frontmatter More information
17. Aug. 2007 · The Beginnings of Husserl’s Philosophy. Part 1: From Über den Begriff der Zahl to Philosophie der Arithmetik. In The new yearbook for phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy V, p. 1–56. Ierna, C. (2006). The Beginnings of Husserl’s Philosophy. Part 2: Philosophical and Mathematical Background.
1. Jan. 2010 · Husserl’s position in his 1891 Philosophy of Arithmetic was resolutely anti-axiomatic. He attacked those who fall into remote, artificial constructions which, with the intent of building the elementary arithmetic concepts out of their ultimate definitional properties, interpret and change their meaning so much that totally strange, practically and scientifically useless conceptual formations ...
In his first book, Philosophy of Arithmetic, Edmund Husserl provides a carefully worked out account of number as a categorial or formal feature of the objective world, and of arithmetic as a symbolic technique for mastering the infinite field of numbers for knowledge. It is a realist account of numbers and number relations that interweaves them into the basic structure of the universe and into ...
Bücher bei Weltbild: Jetzt Philosophy of Arithmetic von Edmund Husserl versandkostenfrei online kaufen bei Weltbild, Ihrem Bücher-Spezialisten!
29. Mai 2007 · Officially, for Kant, judgments are analytic iff the predicate is “contained in” the subject. I defend the containment definition against the common charge of obscurity, and argue that arithmetic cannot be analytic, in the resulting sense. My account deploys two traditional logical notions: logical division and concept hierarchies. Division ...
