Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Originally published in 1966, this pivotal work of Mikel Dufrenne revises Kant’s notion of a priori, a concept previously given insufficient attention by philosophers, to realize a rich understanding that finally does justice to one of Kant’s most troubling cruxes. Following the Husserlian analytics of phenomenology, Dufrenne postulates a ...
26. Feb. 2009 · Originally published in 1966, this pivotal work of Mikel Dufrenne revises Kant’s notion of a priori, a concept previously given insufficient attention by philosophers, to realize a rich understanding that finally does justice to one of Kant’s most troubling cruxes.
- Mikel Dufrenne
which is independent of experience, knowledge a priori.8 Since there is no separation in the order of appearance between a priori and a posteriori knowledge, we must seek a criterion to distinguish between them which is not dependent upon an empirical determination.9 David Hume, in awakening Kant to the seriousness of this question,
A philosopher's attitude to the a priori is a touchstone for his whole approach to the subject. Sometimes, as in Kant's critical philosophy, or in Quine's epistemology, a major new position emerges from reflection on questions that explicitly involve the notions of the a priori or the empirical. But even when no explicit use is made of the ...
30. Jan. 2008 · This paper argues that a priori justification is, in principle, compatible with naturalism—if the a priori is understood in a way that is free of the inessential properties that, historically, have been associated with the concept. I argue that empirical indefeasibility is essential to the primary notion of the a priori; however, the indefeasibility requirement should be interpreted in such ...
« A priori et subjectivité » A propos de la « Notion de l'a priori » de M. Mikel Dufrenne. Emmanuel Levinas - 1962 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 67 (4):490 - 497. Knowledge, Belief, and the A Priori.
10. Aug. 2022 · Abstract. This chapter is devoted to an analysis of the relationship between a priori knowledge – as partly characterized by the proposed analysis of the notions of an a priori warrant and an a priori method – and the notion of infallibility. A variety of predicates – “fallible”, “infallible”, “defeasible”, “indefeasible ...
