Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Published in 1955, History and Truth already announces Ricoeur's interest in history, memory and the problem of historical truth posed on a historical consciousness. The second part is more about actuality, truth being made in history, the links between power and violence, word and practice, the negative and the affirmation of the good. How the ...
The first law states: “that an author must not dare to tell anything but the truth”. (Kelly, 66) The second law states: “that he must make bold to tell the whole truth”. These two laws of Cicero led to an understanding that the “standard of truth was also what distinguished history from its sister art, poetry”.
27. März 2023 · xxiv, 333 p ; 25 cm Bibliographical footnotes Objectivity and subjectivity in history -- The history of philosophy and the unity of truth -- Note on the history of philosophy and the sociology of knowledge -- The history of philosophy and historicity -- Christianity and the meaning of history -- The socius and the neighbor -- The image of God and the epic of man -- Emmanuel Mounier : a ...
9. Mai 2014 · Adam Schaff. Elsevier, May 9, 2014 - History - 278 pages. History and Truth deals with the epistemological premises and the objectivity of historical truth as well as the social conditioning of historical cognition. Both the problem of the model of cognitive relationship and the problem of truth are discussed in the context of true cognition.
10. Sept. 2007 · Paperback. $29.95 7 Used from $13.99 2 New from $25.95. In this volume, Paul Ricoeur investigates the antinomy between history and truth, or between historicity and meaning. He argues that history has meaning insofar as it approaches universality and system, but has no meaning insofar as this universality violates the singularity of individuals ...
- Paperback
- Paul Ricoeur
Reason and Religious Truth: “The Christian Aristotelians argued that where conclusions solely based on reason appeared to differ from divine (revealed) truth, those conclusions had to be rejected or, perhaps better put, had necessarily to be rethought in order to discover a way to reconcile them with revealed truth.”. — William Chester ...
Although philosophers and theologians have speculated on the ability of timeless, ontological truth to manifest itself in the flux of history, most working historians have focused on epistemological questions concerning the relationship between history as what actually happened and history as its present representation. Two extreme positions—naïve positivism and radical constructivism ...
