amazon.de wurde im letzten Monat von mehr als 1.000.000 Nutzern besucht
Wir haben verschiedene Bücher von Hunderten namhafter Autoren für Sie auf Lager. Entdecke eine große Auswahl an Sachbüchern. Jetzt online bestellen!
Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Written for laypeople, Why Marx Was Right outlines ten objections to Marxism that they may hold and aims to refute each one in turn. These include arguments that Marxism is irrelevant owing to changing social classes in the modern world, that it is deterministic and utopian , and that Marxists oppose all reforms and believe in an ...
29. Mai 2011 · Eagleton is right to stress the centrality of democracy to Marxian communism, as well as explain so successfully the nature of free will within Marx and Engels's account of history. This is...
Eagleton defends Marx's ideas against ten common criticisms and argues that he was right enough of the time about enough important issues to make calling oneself a Marxist a reasonable self-description. He also provides a clear introduction to Marx's thought for those unfamiliar with his work.
10. Apr. 2018 · A Yale University Press publication that defends Marx's relevance and influence in the contemporary world. The book covers topics such as capitalism, ideology, culture, politics, and religion from a Marxist perspective.
- Terry Eagleton
- April 10, 2018
1. Juli 2011 · Eagleton challenges the common objections to Marxism and defends its relevance in a world of capitalist crises. He argues that Marxism is not tyrannical, reductionist, deterministic, or outdated, but a powerful critique of capitalism and a vision of a better society.
- (4,8K)
- Hardcover
- Terry Eagleton
13. Dez. 2012 · 2.2K. 138K views 11 years ago. Once the darling of the intelligentsia, Marxism has been out of fashion for at least a couple of decades. Philosopher and critic Terry Eagleton makes the case for...
- 24 Min.
- 142,4K
- The Institute of Art and Ideas
In this pamphlet, Terry Eagleton refutes the most common political, ideological and philosophical arguments against Marx's Marxism, while giving his own view on the way of the world and mankind. His polemic diatribe is far less fanatical than the attacks of Marx's enemies.
