Yahoo Suche Web Suche

  1. amazon.de wurde im letzten Monat von mehr als 1.000.000 Nutzern besucht

    Bei uns finden Sie zahlreiche Produkte von namhaften Herstellern auf Lager. Wähle aus unserer großen Auswahl an diversen Büchern. Jetzt online shoppen!

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Lewis D. Ross. Hello. I’m a philosopher, currently permanent faculty member of the. Department of Philosophy, Logic & Scientific Method at the London School of Economics. If you like, you can: Download my work. Follow me on PhilPapers. Write me! Email: L.ross2 [at]lse.ac.uk. I have broad academic interests.

  2. Lewis Ross is an assistant professor at London School of Economics, Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method. They are interested in Epistemology, Metaphilosophy, Moral Psychology, Philosophy of Law, Social and Political Philosophy, and Virtue Ethics.

  3. L Ross. Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (6), 659-662. , 2021. 2021. Articles 1–18. ‪Assistant Professor, London School of Economics and Political Science‬ - ‪‪Cited by 121‬‬ - ‪epistemology‬ -...

  4. Lewis D. Ross. Recent work takes both philosophical and scientific progress to consist in acquiring factive epistemic states such as knowledge. However, much of this work leaves unclear what...

  5. 9. Mai 2024 · LSE Philosophy Assistant Professor Lewis Ross has published his new book ‘The Philosophy of Legal Proof’ as part of the series ‘Elements in Philosophy of Law’ by Cambridge University Press. Criminal courts make decisions that can remove the liberty and even life of those accused.

  6. 3. Okt. 2021 · Recent literature focuses on potential unfairness to the defending party if we rely on bare statistics. Here, I show that capitulating in response to ‘epistemic gaps’—cases where there is a group of potential harmers but an absence of individuating evidence—can amount to a serious injustice against the party who has been harmed.

  7. 15. Juni 2021 · statistical evidence in the law. Recent work largely centres on a set of puzzles known as. the ‘proof paradox’. While these puzzles may initially seem academic, they have. important ramifications for the law: raising key conceptual questions about legal proof, and practical questions about DNA evidence.