Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
John Hart Ely (/ ˈ iː l iː / EE-lee; December 3, 1938 – October 25, 2003) was an American legal scholar. He was a professor of law at Yale Law School from 1968 to 1973, Harvard Law School from 1973 to 1982, Stanford Law School from 1982 to 1996, and at the University of Miami Law School from 1996 until his death.
8. Mai 2021 · This article explores how John Hart Ely's theory of judicial review can be applied to contexts where democracy is fragile and dysfunctional. It contrasts a narrow and a broad read of Ely, and develops a typology of functions that courts can perform in such situations.
- Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa, David Landau
- 2021
John Hart Ely is a legal scholar who wrote a book on judicial review, a theory of how the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution. The book received praise and criticism from various sources and influenced constitutional theory.
14. Mai 2021 · John Hart Ely’s Democracy and Distrust is a classic among US theories of judicial review. But how far does Ely’s global influence reach? And how useful is Ely’s process-based theory for judges operating in systems with a thicker, more substantive understanding of rights and constitutionalism, as prevails in many countries of ...
- Rosalind Dixon, Michaela Hailbronner
- 2021
27. Okt. 2003 · By Adam Liptak. Oct. 27, 2003. John Hart Ely, a constitutional scholar of dazzling originality and wide influence, died on Saturday in Miami. He was 64. The cause was cancer, his wife, Gisela...
10. Juni 2021 · John Hart Ely’s process theory of judicial review has had an influence on constitutions across the globe. This article explores and evaluates Ely’s influence on the drafting and development of the 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
5. Aug. 1996 · John Hart Ely is a leading contemporary writer on political theory from the standpoint of American constitutional law. This collection covers a full range of topics of constitutional interpretation: federalism, separation of powers, freedom of expression, religious freedom, criminal procedure, racial discrimination, “substantive ...
