Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Laut Riot Lyte zielen die Änderungen – die bereits aufgespielt wurden – darauf ab, die Genauigkeit im Tribunal zu verbessern, den abstimmenden Beschwörern mehr Informationen zu liefern und die negativsten Spieler ausfindig zu machen.
- What It Does
- Justice Review
- Justice Rating
- Who Can Participate
- Punishable Offenses
- Punishments
- Metrics
- Tribunal Mechanics
- Planned Features
- External Links
When a summoner logged into the Tribunal, they were assigned a case to review. Each case involved a summoner who was reported for any number of reasons on multiple occasions. The summoner reviewing the case was given chat logs, game statistics, and report details to help them decide if the offending summoner should be punished or pardoned. A summon...
All the cases judged or skipped, the end result, and how unanimous the decision was could be viewed in the Justice Review. Additionally, a could can be revisited to see the resulting punishment assigned to the offender (permaban, time ban, warning, pardon). The Justice Review also showed a summoner's: total number of cases reviewed, cases correctly...
Summoners that voted on cases in the tribunal developed a justice rating which was calculated using their score and their right/wrong judging percentage. A summoner's score was increased when their vote agrees with the majority verdict. There were no rewards for obtaining a good justice rating.
Any summoner that is level 20 (Formerly 30) who isn't currently banned could participate in reviewing Tribunal cases. A summoner could review up to 20 cases a day. Summoners received a Justice Rating based on how often their votes coincided with the majority vote on cases. On the contrary, if a player repeatedly voted against the majority, they wou...
The following actions are violations of the Summoner's Codeand considered punishable offences: 1. Explicit use of hate terms, racial slurs, cultural epithets, etc. 2. Players who deliberately and viciously insult other players. 3. Repeatedly negative, nonconstructive attitudes. 4. Players whose teasing crosses the line, and who persist after being ...
When a summoner's case received a certain number of "punish" votes (a number not divulged by Riot), they received a punishment intending to deter this behavior from happening again. Possible punishments included a warning, suspension, name change, or in severe cases, permanent banning. The Tribunal automatically assigned some low-level penalties to...
On Friday, May 25, 2012, 3:55, Riot released the following Tribunal metrics: 1. More than 47 million votes have been cast in the Tribunal. 2. 51% of Tribunal cases result in a guilty verdict, with only 5.7% earning a permanent ban. 3. 74% of players warned by the Tribunal just once never end up there again. 4. Over 700 individual cases were persona...
The Tribunal could not issue permanent bans. When a player accumulates enough temporary suspensions (a minimum of five times, unless specially escalated by Player Behavior specialists ), the system...In the online Tribunal case review, a random sampling of games in which the subject player has been reported is displayed.It takes hundreds of reports over dozens of games for a player to end up in the Tribunal. Not all games are displayed for Tribunal judges. The average player has 20-40 reports per 2000 games.Ratio of games to reports is included in the formula that determines if a player ends up in the Tribunal.A number of features have been planned in the future to enhance the Tribunal system. 1. Inclusion of pre and post game chat (such as the champion select and victory/defeat screens) 2. Inclusion of whether players in the game were a part of a premade group or not. 3. At some point in the future, people may also be given rewards depending on their Ju...
24. Mai 2015 · Vor kurzem haben wir hier schon einen Ausblick auf das neue Tribunal geworfen. Jetzt ist ein neues System auf den Servern und soll Riot erste Anhaltspunkte liefern, ob man damit auf dem richtigen Weg ist. Wie das ganze genau funktioniert und worauf ihr achten solltet, könnt ihr im offiziellen Statement von Riot unten nachlesen.
Kurz gesagt: Das Tribunal wird nicht in absehbarer Zeit zurückkommen. Wir haben während seiner Existenz sehr viel vom Tribunal gelernt und es wurde sogar zur Grundlage unseres momentanen Modells für Beleidigungen im Chat.
Das Tribunal war ein System, das im Mai 2011 von Riot Games Inc. eingeführt wurde. um die Spieler zu disziplinieren und die Community mit Hilfe ihrer Kollegen in Schach zu halten. Es ist jedoch seit Anfang 2014 deaktiviert, und seitdem werden Ersatzsysteme langsam eingeführt.
12. Mai 2015 · Seit 2014 arbeitet Riot an einem neuen Tribunal. Wann kommt es und was soll sich alles ändern?
Das erfolgreiche MOBA-Spiel League of Legends verlässt sich nicht nur auf GMs, was das Bestrafen von Trollen und Regelverstößen angeht. Mit einem Tribunal-System bestimmen die Spieler...
