Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Offensive realism is a structural theory in international relations that belongs to the neorealist school of thought and was put forward by the political scholar John Mearsheimer in response to defensive realism. Offensive realism holds that the anarchic nature of the international system is responsible for the promotion of ...

  2. John Joseph Mearsheimer (* 14. Dezember 1947 in Brooklyn, New York City) ist ein US-amerikanischer Politikwissenschaftler an der University of Chicago. Sein Schwerpunkt ist die Analyse internationaler Beziehungen aus der Perspektive des offensiven Neorealismus, den er erstmals 2001 in seiner Monografie The Tragedy of Great Power Politics ...

  3. Mearsheimer is best known for developing the theory of offensive realism, which describes the interaction between great powers as being primarily driven by the rational desire to achieve regional hegemony in an anarchic international system.

  4. Der Realismus, in Abgrenzung zum sogenannten Neorealismus in vielen Fällen genauer auch als Klassischer Realismus bezeichnet, ist eine Denkschule innerhalb der politikwissenschaftlichen Disziplin Internationale Beziehungen, die sich mit dem Charakter und der Verteilung der Macht im internationalen System auseinandersetzt.

  5. Offensive realism, developed by Mearsheimer differs in the amount of power that states desire. Mearsheimer proposes that states maximize relative power ultimately aiming for regional hegemony. In addition to Mearsheimer, a number of other scholars have sought to explain why states expand when opportunities to do so arise.

  6. Security dilemma - Wikipedia. Contents. hide. (Top) Basic components. Defensive realism. Offensive realism. Offensedefense theory. Arms race. Alliance formation. Chain ganging. Buck passing. Criticisms and responses. See also. References. Security dilemma. Part of a series on. War. Outline. History. Military. Battlespace. Weapons. Tactics.

  7. Offensive realists accept that threatened states usually balance against dangerous foes, however, they maintain that balancing is often inefficient and that this inefficiency provides opportunities for a clever aggressor to take advantage of its adversaries.