amazon.de wurde im letzten Monat von mehr als 1.000.000 Nutzern besucht
Entdecken tausende Produkte. Lesen Kundenbewertungen und finde Bestseller. Erhalten auf Amazon Angebote für ähnliche artikel im Bereich Bücher
Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
He also provides a blueprint for a return to a 100 percent reserve gold standard. The book made huge theoretical advances. He was the first to prove that the government, and only the government, can destroy money on a mass scale, and he showed exactly how they go about this dirty deed. But just as importantly, it is beautifully written. He ...
- Hardcover
- Murray N. Rothbard
The second part of the book, The Case for the 100 Percent Gold Dollar , is not as persuasive, even if it does possess theoretical merit. For one, on the monetary side, fractional-reserve banking is so well-entrenched that to even contemplate that consumers would pay "warehousing fees" for the safe-keeping of their money, rather than receive an interest income, is rather difficult; not is it ...
Includes "The Case for a 100% Gold Dollar" by Murray N. Rothbard . What Has Government Done to Our Money? Murray N. Rothbard Government 4.8 • 24 Ratings; Murray N. Rothbard's most famous essay on monetary theory. Buffoonish and evil politicians, ...
The Mises Institute has united this book with its natural complement: a detailed reform proposal for a 100 percent gold dollar. "The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar" was written a decade before the last vestiges of the gold standard were abolished. Rothbard's unique plan for making the dollar sound again still holds up. Some people have said that Rothbard tells us what is wrong with money ...
- (170)
What Has Government Done to Our Money?: (formerly, Money, Free and Unfree) Murray Newton Rothbard Snippet view - 1965 Murray Newton Rothbard Snippet view - 1990
20. Dez. 2022 · The second part of the book, The Case for the 100 Percent Gold Dollar , is not as persuasive, even if it does possess theoretical merit. For one, on the monetary side, fractional-reserve banking is so well-entrenched that to even contemplate that consumers would pay "warehousing fees" for the safe-keeping of their money, rather than receive an interest income, is rather difficult; not is it ...
“We conclude, therefore, that determining the supply of money, like all other goods, is best left to the free market. Aside from the general moral and economic advantages of freedom over coercion, no dictated quantity of money will do the work better, and the free market will set the production of gold in accordance with its relative ability to satisfy the needs of consumers, as compared ...
