Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
18. Feb. 2013 · When Henry Richardson decided to be an artist, he opted out of art school and decided to take a more direct route delving right in. Self-taught, he started as a painter and eventually worked his way up to his current passion, glass sculpture. While many glass art is done by blowing or casting, Richa
Henry S. Richardson Georgetown University Categories. Biomedical Ethics in Applied Ethics. Keywords. Add keywords. Reprint years. DOI. 10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-h;ft285. Links PhilArchive. Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 90,974 ...
Democratic Autonomy squarely faces these challenges to the deliberative democratic ideal. It identifies processes of reasoning that avert bureaucratic domination and bring diverse people into political agreement. To bridge our differences intelligently, Richardson argues, we cannot rely on instrumentalist approaches to policy reasoning, such as ...
Henry S. Richardson - 2012 - Oup Usa. The philosopher Henry Richardson's short book is a defense of a position on a neglected topic in medical research ethics. Clinical research ethics has been a longstanding area of study, dating back to the aftermath of the Nazi death-camp doctors and the Tuskegee syphilis study.
Henry S. Richardson earned graduate degrees in law and in public policy at Harvard before getting his Ph.D. there (under John Rawls) in 1986. Dr. Richardson’s work centers on practical reasoning in all of its many guises: in the reasoning of individuals about their aims, in the democratic reasoning of citizens about public policy, and in our moral reasoning.
Recent graduate courses include seminars on political philosophy, moral reasoning, role morality, and moral innovation, and an interdisciplinary seminar on special obligations co-taught at Georgetown's Law School. In 2014-15, Dr. Richardson is teaching a year-long Moral Innovation Seminar, sponsored by Georgetown’s Normative Orders ...
Henry Richardson argues that we can determine our ends rationally. He constructs a rich and original theory of how we can reason about our final goals. Richardson defuses the counter-arguments for the limits of rational deliberation, and develops interesting ideas about how his model might be extended to interpersonal deliberation of ends ...
