Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. The High Numbers. For just a few months in 1964 (approximately July to October), the Who changed their name to the High Numbers, releasing one single under that billing before reverting to the more inventive and appropriate…. Read Full Biography.

  2. obviously there is not to much out there from the high numbers days of 1964 before they changed there name to the who, this disc displays some of the best recordings both live and studio from the high numbers in october 1964, great r&b and very raw sounding tracks on all songs, these are all covers of coarse recorded in october 64 when this batch was recorded was the high numbers the im the ...

  3. BBC Sessions. The Who. Released. 2000 — US. CD —. Album. View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 1999 CDr release of "Remembers The High Numbers" on Discogs.

  4. From Gotta Dance To Keep From Crying to You Really Got Me.One of the best early Who gig. Feel the power of "young Pete". The High Numbers (the Who) Railway H...

    • 72 Min.
    • 130,3K
    • jrgbello
  5. The High Numbers discography and songs: Music profile for The High Numbers, formed 1964. Genres: Mod, British Rhythm & Blues. Albums include Music From the Soundtrack of The Who Film Quadrophenia, Zoot Suit / I'm the Face, and The Who Hits 50!.

  6. 20. Apr. 2013 · 1. In principle, there's nothing really wrong with describing numbers as high or low, but I think it's more natural to speak of large/great or small numbers. Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36. @njd: That's just what I said: when the size of the number matters, then "high" and "low" are good, just as a high card (King) versus a low card (deuce). user21497.

  7. Early Who studio recording possibly financed by Kit Lambert and Chris Stamp? I think it's cool.smokestack lightning * walking the dog * improv * i'm a man * ...

    • 24 Min.
    • 17,4K
    • NonDirectionalFilms