Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. 8. Mai 2024 · Seymour Papert was a South African-born mathematician and computer scientist who was best known for his contributions to the understanding of children’s learning processes and to the ways in which technology can support learning. He invented Logo, a computer-programming language that was an.

    • Nicole Ellison
  2. 16. Mai 2024 · Ihre erste bezahlte Stelle als Programmiererin sollte bald folgen: Unter der Leitung von Seymour Papert arbeitete Radia Perlman im LOGO Lab des MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory an TORTIS (Toddler's Own Recursive Turtle Interpreter System) mit, eine Kinderversion der bildungsorientierten funktionalen Programmiersprache LOGO.

  3. Vor 5 Tagen · In den 1960er Jahren erlebten neuronale Netzwerke eine erste Blütezeit, die jedoch durch die kritischen Arbeiten von Marvin Minsky und Seymour Papert in den 1970er Jahren ein vorläufiges Ende fand. Sie zeigten, dass einfache neuronale Netze bestimmte Probleme nicht lösen konnten, was das Interesse an dieser Technologie vorübergehend dämpfte.

  4. Vor 2 Tagen · Seymour Papert 6. Seymour Papert. South African born Wits mathematician and MIT computer scientist Seymour Papert is the creator of the Logo programming language, a tool to help children develop their thinking and problem-solving skills. Papert’s work revolved around theories of learning and how computing could be used as a tool to enhance ...

  5. 8. Mai 2024 · As educational technologist Seymour Papert put it, “better learning will not come from finding better ways for the teacher to instruct but from giving the learner better opportunities to construct” (Papert, 1990, p. 3).

  6. 8. Mai 2024 · Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert published the book “Perceptrons,” revealing that Rosenblatt’s perceptron could not solve complex functions like the XOR operation. This setback led to a period...

  7. 20. Mai 2024 · Minsky and Papert's book was the first example of a mathematical analysis carried far enough to show the exact limitations of a class of computing machines that could seriously be considered as models of the brain.