Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
9. Dez. 2007 · 1. Examples that illustrate the difference between a priori and a posteriori (empirical) justification. 2. What sorts of propositions can be a priori justified and known: all, and only, modal propositions? 3. Is a priori justification fallible and defeasible? 4. What is the nature of a priori justification?
The notion of the a priori by Dufrenne, Mikel. Publication date 1966 Topics Empiricism, Philosophie, Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 -- Contributions in theory of knowledge, Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804, Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 -- Et l'a priori, Expérience, Exp ...
19. Juni 2019 · The notion of the a priori. by. Dufrenne, Mikel. Publication date. 1966. Topics. Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 -- Knowledge, Theory of, Experience. Publisher. [Evanston, Ill.] Northwestern University Press.
10. Juli 2018 · Roughly, a priori knowledge can be understood as knowledge acquired in a way that is suitably independent of the thinker’s experience. But even if we assume that there is a priori knowledge, and that the notion of the a priori is in good standing, a pressing question remains about its possibility. What is peculiar about the ...
- Célia Teixeira
- celia.teixeira@gmail.com
- 2019
26. Feb. 2009 · The Notion of the A Priori. Originally published in 1966, this pivotal work of Mikel Dufrenne revises Kant’s notion of a priori, a concept previously given insufficient...
A philosopher's attitude to the a priori is a touchstone for his whole approach to the subject. Sometimes, as in Kant's critical philosophy, or in Quine's epistemology, a major new position emerges from reflection on questions that explicitly involve the notions of the a priori or the empirical. But even when no explicit use is made of the ...
which is independent of experience, knowledge a priori.8 Since there is no separation in the order of appearance between a priori and a posteriori knowledge, we must seek a criterion to distinguish between them which is not dependent upon an empirical determination.9 David Hume, in awakening Kant to the seriousness of this question,
