Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
A Theory of Justice ( deutsch „Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit“) ist der Buchtitel eines 1971 veröffentlichten, vielbeachteten Buchs des US-amerikanischen Philosophen John Rawls. [1] Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Allgemeines. 2 Entstehung und Aufbau des Buches. 3 Formale und substanzielle Gerechtigkeit. 4 Anwendungsverhältnisse der Gerechtigkeit.
A Theory of Justice is a 1971 work of political philosophy and ethics by the philosopher John Rawls (1921–2002) in which the author attempts to provide a moral theory alternative to utilitarianism and that addresses the problem of distributive justice (the socially just distribution of goods in a society). The theory uses an ...
- John Rawls
- 1971
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvkjb25m.15. xml. 978-0-674-04258-2. Philosophy, Political Science, Peace & Conflict Studies. Since it appeared in 1971, John Rawls's A Theory ofJustice has become a classic. The author has now revised theoriginal edition to clear up a number of dif...
- JOHN RAWLS
A classic work of political philosophy that argues for a conception of justice as fairness based on the original position and the veil of ignorance. The book covers topics such as principles of justice, institutions, duty, obligation, goodness, and the sense of justice.
- 1MB
- 561
A classic work of political philosophy that explores the concept of justice and its application to society. The author revised the original edition to address criticisms and clarify his arguments, and the book received praise and acclaim from various reviewers.
6. Juni 2023 · Wegen des überragenden Werts der Gerechtigkeit, auch weil John Rawls sie in seine, Hauptwerk mit dem Prinzip der Freiheit unmittelbar verknüpft, ist es nicht erstaunlich, dass dieses Werk, A Theory of Justice, auf Deutsch Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, weltweit eine außergewöhnliche Reputation gefunden hat.
The theory of justice may be divided into two main parts: (1) an interpretation of the initial situation and a formulation of the various principles available for choice there, and (2) an argument establishing which of these principles would in fact be adopted.
