Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Summary. In The Differend, based on Immanuel Kant 's views on the separation of Understanding, Judgment, and Reason, Lyotard identifies the moment in which language fails as the differend, and explains it as follows: "...the unstable state and instant of language wherein something which must be able to be put into phrases cannot yet ...
- Jean François Lyotard
- 1983
22. Aug. 2022 · Focussing on Lyotard’s text ‘The Differend’, I show how its conceptual framework and philosophy of language locates the cause of deep disagreement not in the epistemic realm, but in things which do not fully submit to epistemic evaluation: the radically incomplete and open nature of language, and our increasingly politically ...
- James Cartlidge
- jkcartlidge92@googlemail.com
15. Mai 2019 · The differend : phrases in dispute. by. Lyotard, Jean François. Publication date. 1988. Topics. Philosophy. Publisher. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
Quick Reference. A wrong or injustice that arises because the discourse in which the wrong might be expressed does not exist. To put it another way, it is a wrong or injustice that arises because the prevailing or hegemonic discourse actively precludes the possibility of this wrong being expressed.
This original study examines Jean-François Lyotard's philosophical concept of the differend and details its unexplored implications for literature. it provides a new framework with which to understand the discourse itself, from its Homeric beginnings to postmodern works by authors such as Michael Ondaatje and Jonathan Safran Foer.
- Dylan Sawyer
21. Sept. 2018 · Lyotard offers a number of examples of differends: the relation of colonizer and the colonized or between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, but he opens The Differend with the case of the French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, who claimed that the only testimony that he would accept would be that of someone who had actually ...
3. Dez. 2016 · Jean-François Lyotard defines ‘the differend’ as a divide that cannot be bridged, or a difference that cannot be resolved for lack of a rule that ultimately binds both parties. Do criticism and philosophy face a differend, or can they combine to answer shared questions? Download chapter PDF. Similar content being viewed by others.
