Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. 9. Dez. 2011 · The book examines where this conflict is supposed to existevolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religionas well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist.

    • Alvin Plantinga
  2. 9. Dez. 2011 · Books. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga,...

  3. 11. Juli 2023 · Where the conflict really lies : science, religion, and naturalism : Plantinga, Alvin : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. by. Plantinga, Alvin. Publication date. 2011. Topics. Religion and science, Evolution (Biology) -- Religious aspects -- Christianity, Naturalism -- Religious aspects -- Christianity. Publisher.

  4. 23. Juli 2014 · A prominent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, here writes on one of our biggest debates—the compatibility of science and religion. I will begin this review by summarizing the contents of the book.

    • Bradford Mccall
    • bradfordlmcall@gmail.com
    • 2014
  5. 5. Aug. 2012 · In Where the Conflict Really Lies, Alvin Plantinga sets out to demonstrate that, appearances to the contrary, there is no real conflict between science and (theistic) religion. While there are areas of superficial or apparent incompatibility, underneath we find a deep concord.

    • Maarten Boudry
    • maartenboudry@gmail.com
    • 2013
  6. 1. Jan. 2011 · Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Alvin Plantinga. 4.03. 951 ratings150 reviews. This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion.

  7. 30. Nov. 2011 · In this long-awaited book, pre-eminent analytical philosopher Alvin Plantinga argues that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper...