Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
26. Juni 2013 · United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013) Windsor and Spyer, two women, married in Canada in 2007. Their home state, New York, recognized the marriage. Spyer died in 2009 and left her estate to Windsor, who sought to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses.
- 280 U.S. 379
Ex parte Burrus, 136 U. S. 586, 136 U. S. 583, 136 U. S....
- 280 U.S. 379
United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights case concerning same-sex marriage. The Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Respondent. Edith Windsor, in her capacity as the executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. Location. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Docket no. 12-307. Decided by. Roberts Court. Lower court. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Citation. 570 US 744 (2013) Granted. Dec 7, 2012. Argued.
26. Juni 2013 · United States v. Windsor, legal case, decided on June 26, 2013, in which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (1996; DOMA), which had defined marriage for federal purposes as a legal union between one man and one woman.
UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR, executor of the ESTATE OF SPYER, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. No. 12–307. Argued March 27, 2013—Decided June 26, 2013. The State of New York recognizes the marriage of New York residents Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, who wed in Ontario, Canada, in 2007.
Windsor claimed the federal estate-tax exemption for surviving spouses but was denied under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1 U.S.C. § 7. The provision amends the definition of marriage to a “union between one man and one woman” and defines spouse as an opposite-sex husband or wife.
Windsor (2013) Primary tabs The Supreme Court case which held that the Defense of Marriage Act’s (DOMA) provision excluding same-sex married individuals from the definition of spouse violated the protections afforded by Fifth Amendment and was thus unconstitutional.
