Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Ellis and Young's model (1988) suggests that two main processing steps are involved in speech sound production: phonemic activation and articulation (see Figure 2 in Introduction). In a...

  2. One model that is particularly successful at explaining language deficits in aphasia and incorporates visual and auditory input and output processes into its framework is the Ellis and Young model of monolingual language processing (1988). This model, though focused on one language, emphasizes the process of how spoken, written or visual ...

    • Teresa Gray, Swathi Kiran
    • 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0091)
    • 2013
    • 2013/08
  3. The Ellis and Young (1988) Transcoding Model. See firstly the supporting commentary for this material. This is the first of the large scale psycholinguistic models to be widely published. It is derived from the earlier models via Ellis (1982), and is a good example of how to display highly modular cognitive processing in dataflow diagram (DFD ...

  4. 16. Jan. 2019 · Citations: 83. Sections. PDF. Tools. Abstract. Cognition is not just ‘in the head’; it extends well beyond the skull and the skin. Non-Cartesian Cognitive Science views cognition as being embodied, environmentally embedded, enacted, encultured, and socially distributed.

    • Nick C. Ellis
    • 2019
  5. 1. Feb. 2000 · The "two-route model of face recognition" proposed by Bauer (1984) and adopted by Ellis and Young (1990), has become a widely accepted model in studies of face processing disorders,...

  6. 1. Jan. 2018 · In line with burgeoning interest in the 1980s in using neuropsychological evidence to test and refine cognitive models (Ellis & Young, 1988; Shallice, 1988), Bruce and Young (1986) placed considerable emphasis on the consequences of brain injury for recognising face identity and expression. From the limited evidence available to them ...

  7. In Experiment 1, real age of acquisition emerged as a powerful predictor of adult object-naming speed. There were also significant effects of visual complexity, word frequency, and name agreement. Similar results were obtained in reanalyses of data from 2 other studies of object naming.