Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
29. Mai 2024 · Das Denken von Emmanuel Levinas (1906–1995) hat nicht nur eine klare strukturelle Affinität zu Plotins Metaphysik des Einen; Levinas bezieht sich in wichtigen Teilen seines Œuvres auch wiederholt explizit auf ihn, wobei seine Einschätzung zwischen Bestätigung und Kritik schwankt.
Vor einem Tag · Emmanuel Levinas (1905–1995) was another student of Heidegger’s, like Arendt, who developed a very different sense of “first philosophy.” For Levinas, first philosophy should neither be metaphysics or ontology, but rather ethics. The clip shows how close he was to Heidegger’s thought of Being and yet how far away at the same time.
Vor 5 Tagen · D. Pollefeyt, Theology as Ethics: Emmanuel Levinas as Jewish Post-Holocaust Thinker, in The Value of the Particular: Lessons from Judaism and the Modern Jewish Experience, Leiden, Brill, 2015, 322-339.
Vor 6 Tagen · Nigel Rapport is Professor Emeritus of Anthropological and Philosophical Studies at the University of St Andrews. His most recent monographs are: Cosmopolitan love and individuality: Ethical engagement beyond culture (2019, Rowman & Littlefield), and ‘I am here’, Abraham said: Emmanuel Levinas and a science of anthropology (2024, Berghahn ...
28. Mai 2024 · Das Buch, das nun in neuer Auflage erscheint, gilt als die beste Einführung in sein Werk. Emmanuel Lévinas wird heute als der wichtigste Philosoph einer zeitgenössischen Ethik erachtet, die die schrecklichen Erfahrungen des 20. Jahrhunderts berücksichtigen muss.
Vor 2 Tagen · The purpose of this essay is to analyze the theodicy of violence in its two different forms: the antinomian and the hypernomian. The theodicy of violence deliberately blurs the lines between the messianic idiom of Walter Benjamin’s Toward the Critique of Violence (2021), with its stark contrast between mythic and divine violence, and the Lacanian idiom of various subjective positions toward ...
Vor 4 Tagen · This chapter compares the thought of Axel Honneth with that of two contemporary French philosophers - Jean-François Lyotard and Emmanuel Levinas - from the point of view of the rejection of justice. It attempts to situate Honneth, Lyotard and Levinas in relation to a post-Marxist situation or configuration that may be, a priori, what they have in common. First of all, the attempts made by ...
