Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Paul M. Romer University of Chicago Growth in this model is driven by technological change that arises from intentional investment decisions made by profit-maximizing agents. The distinguishing feature of the technology as an input is that it is neither a conventional good nor a public good; it is a non-rival, partially excludable good. Because ...

  2. Romer, Paul. "Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth." In Equilibrium Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics, edited by William Barnett et al. 1991. Rosenberg, Nathan. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. 1982. World Bank.

  3. 11. Apr. 2020 · Wie sich die Coronakrise auf effiziente Weise bewältigen lässt. Ökonom Paul Romer sagt: Alle Bürger zu testen, sei viel besser und günstiger als die Politik des Lockdowns. Hier erklärt er ...

  4. 5. Juni 2012 · Der Ökonom Paul Romer plant am Reißbrett eine Metropole für Honduras. Im Interview beschreibt er seine Vision: die perfekte Stadt, unabhängig und mit eigener Verfassung.

  5. paulromer.net › conditional-optimism-technology-and-climatePaul Romer

    8. Okt. 2018 · Economist. Policy Entrepreneur. Geek. Co-recipient of the 2018 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. University Professor at NYU. Focused on urbanization; cooperation at scale of millions and billions; science; technology; economic development; long-term growth; code as language.

  6. 17. Okt. 2018 · To this day, Paul M. Romer’s passion for policy is evident. Since 2011, he has been working on urban policy at NYU’s Marron Institute of Urban Management, which he founded, exploring the role of cities to spur catch-up growth, with an emphasis on city planning. The objective is to formulate policies leading to urban expansion conducive to ...

  7. paulromer.net › economic-growthPaul Romer

    13. Apr. 2016 · In 1980, GDP per capita started at about $1100. Over the same interval, its growth averaged 4.1%, which raised GDP per capita to $4000, for an increase by a factor of 3.6. The difference between 5.8% and 4.1% seems small compared to the difference between an increase by a factor of 6.0 instead of 3.6. When I was growing up, I was told to eat my ...