Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Research problem: Concurrent think-aloud (CTA) protocols are one of the dominant approaches of usability testing. However, there is still debate about the validity of the method, partly focusing on the usefulness and exhaustiveness of participants' verbalizations. The rise of eye-tracking technology sheds new light on this discussion, as participants' working processes can now be observed in ...
1. Okt. 2010 · Concurrent think-aloud protocol (CTA) is often used in usability test settings to gain insight into participants' thoughts during their task performances.
Sasaki, Tomomi (2008): Concurrent think-aloud protocol as a socially situated construct. In: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Jg. 46, Nr. 4: 349-374. Völzke, Katja (2012): Lautes Denken bei kompetenzorientierten Diagnoseaufgaben zur naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisgewinnung. Reihe Studium und Forschung ...
Concurrent Think Aloud (CTA)” meliputi identifikasi masalah, merumuskan masalah, tujuan dan manfaat, melakukan studi literatur, menentukan variabel metode penelitian, menentukan responden, pengumpulan data dan melakukan pengujian usability testing, melakukan pengolahan data, mengalaisis data dan membuat rekomendasi perbaikan. 2.2 Data
Abstract: Concurrent think-aloud protocol (CTA) is often used in usability test settings to gain insight into participants' thoughts during their task performances. This study adds to a growing body of research within technical communication that addresses the use of think-aloud protocols in usability test settings.
Retrospective think-aloud (RTA) is a research method usuallyapplied in usability tests. While participants applying the concurrent think-aloud method are verbalizing their thoughts as they simultaneouslycomplete test tasks, participants verbalized thoughts, using theretrospective think-aloud method, are only recorded after thecompletion of the ...
19. Apr. 2018 · This paper presents the results of a study that compared three think-aloud methods: concurrent think-aloud, retrospective think-aloud, and a hybrid method. The three methods were compared through an evaluation of a library website, which involved four points of comparison: task performance, participants' experiences, usability problems discovered, and the cost of employing the methods. The ...
