Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
United States v. Windsor. LII note: The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided United States v. Windsor. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer married in Toronto in 2007 where same-sex marriages were legal. At the time of Spyer’s death, the state of New York recognized the couple’s marriage. However, the IRS denied Windsor use of a spousal estate tax ...
美国诉温莎案（ United States v. Windsor ）， 570 U.S. 12 (2013)，是美国最高法院有关美国同性婚姻的重要案件，该案是对美国纽约南区地方法院一审，美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院二审维持原判的艾迪絲·溫莎诉美利坚合众国案进行审查，在该案中，两审法院均认定《捍卫婚姻法案》第3章中将“婚姻”定义为 ...
31. Mai 2013 · Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s release of its decision in United States v. Windsor, No. 12-307 (June 26, 2013) , DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano issued an updated statement confirming that “President Obama [had] directed federal departments to ensure the decision and its implication for federal benefits for same-sex legally married couples are implemented swiftly and smoothly.”
(quoting United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744, 758 (2013)). 40 See id. at 2196–97 ( “Here, petitioner and the Government disagree about whether petitioner must comply with the civil investigative demand. The lower courts sided with the Government, and the Government has not volunteered to relinquish that victory and withdraw the demand ...
30. Juli 2015 · United States v. Windsor On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 35 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)6 was unconstitutional. Section 3 required that, for purposes of federal enactments, marriage be defined as the union of one man and one woman and the word spouse be defined as
amendment, and neither United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), nor Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 U.S. 2017 (2015), had been decided. This Court noted the significance of parallel facts in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colo. Civil Rights Comm ïn, 138 S. Ct. 1719, 1728 (2018).
21. Apr. 2017 · "551 U.S. 587, 599,127 S.Ct. 2553,168 L.Ed.2d 424"United States v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 2680 (2013)Such a suggestion would be impossible, given the Federal Government's long history of making pronouncements regarding marriage—for example, conditioning Utah's entry into the Union upon its prohibition of polygamy. See Act of July 16, 1894, ch.
