Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
24. März 2017 · Windsor, United States Supreme Court, (2013) Case Summary of United States v. Windsor. Windsor and Spyer were legally married and moved to New York, a state which recognized their same-sex marriage. Spyer died, leaving her estate to Windsor. Windsor was denied a federal tax exemption due to the fact the couple was not of the opposite sex.
Citation133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013) Brief Fact Summary. Windsor (Plaintiff) sued to recover the tax payment she paid after inheriting her same-sex spouse’s estate and being denied the estate tax exemption for surviving spouses because the Defense of Marriage Act defines “marriage” and “spouse” to exclude same-sex couples. Synopsis of Rule ...
26. Juni 2013 · NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
美國訴溫莎案（ United States v. Windsor ）， 570 U.S. 12 (2013)，是美國最高法院有關美國同性婚姻的重要案件，該案是對美國紐約南區地方法院一審，美國聯邦第二巡迴上訴法院二審維持原判的艾迪絲·溫莎訴美利堅合眾國案進行審查，在該案中，兩審法院均認定《捍衛婚姻法案》第3章中將「婚姻」定義為 ...
U.S. Reports: United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013). Names Kennedy, Anthony M. (Judge) Supreme Court of the United States (Author) Headings - Law - Law Library - Supreme Court - United States - Government Documents - Judicial review and appeals - ...
UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SPYER, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 12–307. Argued March 27, 2013—Decided June 26, 2013. The State of New York recognizes the marriage of New York residents Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, who wed in Ontario, Canada, in 2007. When Spyer ...
26. Juni 2013 · Windsor, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's decision in Windsor v.
