Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Vor 2 Tagen · Zusammenfassung. This chapter focuses on the reception of Neo-Platonism in Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Marion against the backdrop of Heidegger’s radical critique of metaphysics as ‘onto-theology’. Derrida refers to Neo-Platonic motifs in his analyses of the limits of categorical language.

  2. Vor 5 Tagen · This chapter discusses in detail the two forms that hospitality can take according to Derrida, namely, that which is offered without conditions or terms, which he calls ‘unconditional,’ and that which is offered to the guest ‘conditionally.’...

  3. Vor einem Tag · Impuls. Der Souverän sind wir! – „Blockout2024“. Maximilian Kisters veröffentlicht am 30 Mai 2024 4 min. Eine Protestbewegung gegen den Krieg in Gaza appelliert an Influencer statt Politiker. Sie kämpfen um die kulturelle Hegemonie und zeigen dabei, dass sie die Machtverhältnisse in den Sozialen Medien verstehen. Unter dem Titel ...

  4. Vor 5 Tagen · For Derrida, the decision of hospitality must go beyond what is simply possible for the host, beyond what is desirable or possible for them, and as such the decision of hospitality can only be the decision of the other in the host.

  5. Vor 4 Tagen · Derrida: Deconstruction etc. Today, we plunge into the depths of Derridean thought. Jacques Derrida, a luminary in French philosophy, is renowned for developing deconstruction—a form of semiotic analysis that dissects and subverts traditional structures of meaning.

  6. Vor einem Tag · SEMINAIRE Architectures : une hantologie Médiums Patrick Condouret Rémy Jacquier Pierre-Albert Perrillat MERCREDI 5 JUIN 9h30 - 12h30 Atelier 404 Entrée Libre L’hantologie, du point de vue de Derrida, consiste plutôt à laisser le mort exister dans son altérité radicale, sans chercher à l’intérioriser dans un beau souvenir. Il

  7. Derrida and co. (who I'm interpreting as Foucault and Deleuze for lack of better compatriots) question the possibility of truth as it had been traditionally conceived. The short answer is that no, none of them believed that the truth was subjectively or culturally relative and in fact a lot of their work can be seen as a critique of this notion.