Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. [ Supreme Injustice] tells the story of three United States Supreme Court Justices…and their ‘slavery jurisprudence.’. Each of these men, Finkelman argues…shared the belief that antislavery agitation undermined the legal and political structures instituted by the Constitution…

  2. 3. Dez. 2018 · [Supreme Injustice] tells the story of three United States Supreme Court Justices…and their ‘slavery jurisprudence.’ Each of these men, Finkelman argues…shared the belief that antislavery agitation undermined the legal and political structures instituted by the Constitution… Finkelman insists that the legacy of Marshall, Story, and Taney had enormous implications…strengthening the ...

  3. Legal historian Paul Finkelman discusses his book Supreme Injustice, which highlights the three most important Supreme Court Justices before the Civil War—John Marshall, Roger B. Taney, and...

    • 71 Min.
    • 5,6K
    • US National Archives
  4. 8. Jan. 2018 · In Supreme Injustice, the distinguished legal historian Paul Finkelman establishes an authoritative account of each justice’s proslavery position, the reasoning behind his opposition to black freedom, and the incentives created by circumstances in his private life.

    • (31)
    • Harvard University Press
    • $35
    • Paul Finkelman
  5. 8. Jan. 2018 · Finkelman situates this infamous holding within a solid record of support for slavery and hostility to free blacks.Supreme Injustice boldly documents the entanglements that alienated three...

  6. 29. Okt. 2018 · In Supreme Injustice, the prolific Paul Finkelman takes on the three most important Supreme Court justices of the antebellum era: John Marshall, Joseph Story, and Roger B. Taney. When questions regarding slavery came before them, all three justices “invariably voted against liberty and in favor of slavery” (25).

  7. In Supreme Injustice, the distinguished legal historian Paul Finkelman establish­es an authoritative account of each justice’s proslavery position, the reasoning behind his opposition to Black freedom, and the incentives created by circumstances in his private life.