Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Atest of some hypotheses generated by Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance, viz., that "if a person is induced to do or say something which is contrary to his private opinion, there will be a tendency for him to change his opinion so as to bring it into correspondence with what he has done or said. The larger the pressure used to elicit the overt behavior… the weaker will be the ...

    • Leon Festinger, James M. Carlsmith
    • 2011
  2. COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED COMPLIANCE. LEON FESTINGER AND JAMES M. CARLSMITH1. Stanford. WHAT happens to a person's private opinion if he is forced to do or say something contrary to that opin-ion? Only recently has there been, any experi-mental work related to this question.

    • 664KB
    • 8
  3. 28. Jan. 2011 · TLDR. The present experiment was designed to investigate the effects of one type of demand that is frequently made upon a person when he is induced to play a social role, namely, the requirement that he overtly verbalize to others various opinions which may not correspond to his inner convictions. Expand.

  4. COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED COMPLIANCE . Leon Festinger & James M. Carlsmith[1] (1959) . First published in Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-‐210. What happens to a person's private opinion if he is forced to do or say something contrary to that opinion?

    • 187KB
    • 13
  5. Leon Festinger and James M. Carlsmith (1959) conducted an experiment entitled "Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance". This study involved 71 male students from Stanford University, of which 11 students were disqualified.

  6. Cognitive Consequences of forced Compliance Leon Festinger und James M. Carlsmith Stanfort University 1 Ulrike Grave 06.12.2011 . Was passiert mit der persönlichen Meinung einer Person, wenn er/sie dazu gezwungen wird, etwas entgegen dieser Meinung zu s ...

  7. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J Abnorm Psychol. 1959 Mar;58 (2):203-10. doi: 10.1037/h0041593.