Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. The reference and sense of a sign are to be distinguished from the. [p25] associated idea. If the reference of a sign is an object perceivable by the senses, my idea of it is an internal image, [5] arising from memories of sense impressions which I have had and acts, both internal and external, which I have performed.

    • 270KB
    • 17
  2. 13. Okt. 2023 · The regular connexion between a sign, its sense, and its reference is of such a kind that to the sign there corresponds a definite sense and to that in turn a definite reference, while to a given reference (an object) there does not belong only a single sign.

  3. In the philosophy of language, the distinction between sense and reference was an idea of the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege in 1892 (in his paper "On Sense and Reference"; German: "Über Sinn und Bedeutung"), reflecting the two ways he believed a singular term may have meaning.

  4. The reference and sense of a sign are to be distinguished from the associated idea. If the reference of a sign is an object perceivable by the senses, my idea of it is an inter-nal image,[3] arising from memories of sense impressions which I have had and acts, both internal and external, which I have performed.

  5. 14. Sept. 1995 · He published three of his most well-known papers, ‘Function and Concept’ (1891), ‘On Sense and Reference’ (1892a), and ‘On Concept and Object’ (1892b) in this period. These works were eventually supplemented by three other papers on the philosophy of language, from a later period, ‘The Thought’ (1918a), ‘Negation ...

  6. 5. Juni 2012 · Summary. Key text. Gottlob Frege, ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitung für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100 (1892), pp. 25–50; translated (for example) as ‘On Sense and Meaning’ in G. Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. B. McGuinness (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984); this paper appears in ...

  7. 8 - On sense and reference: a critical reception. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2010. By. William Taschek. Edited by. Tom Ricketts and. Michael Potter. Chapter. Get access. Cite. Summary.