Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. On sense and reference. GOTTLOB FREGE. [As reprinted in A.W. Moore (ed.) Meaning and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.] Equality [1] gives rise to challenging questions which are not altogether easy to answer. Is it a relation? A relation between objects, or between names or signs of objects?

    • 270KB
    • 17
  2. In the philosophy of language, the distinction between sense and reference was an idea of the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege in 1892 (in his paper "On Sense and Reference"; German: "Über Sinn und Bedeutung"), reflecting the two ways he believed a singular term may have meaning.

  3. 13. Okt. 2023 · The regular connexion between a sign, its sense, and its reference is of such a kind that to the sign there corresponds a definite sense and to that in turn a definite reference, while to a given reference (an object) there does not belong only a single sign.

  4. The regular connexion between a sign, its sense, and its reference is of such a kind that to the sign there corre-sponds a definite sense and to that in turn a definite ref-erence, while to a given reference (an object) there does not belong only a single sign.

  5. 14. Sept. 1995 · Frege’s seminal paper in the philosophy of language is ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’ (‘On Sense and Reference’, 1892a). In this paper, Frege considered two puzzles about language and noticed, in each case, that one cannot account for the meaningfulness or logical behavior of certain sentences simply on the basis of the ...

  6. 5. Juni 2012 · Introduction. The German mathematician and philosopher, Gottlob Frege, is widely regarded as the father of analytic philosophy. His work has shaped everything which has been written in the philosophy of language in the analytic tradition. I think there are two principal reasons for this.

  7. As influential as Frege's distinction between sense and reference has been in shaping nearly all contemporary work in the philosophy of language - as well as considerable portions of the philosophy of mind - many of its most prominent critics and proponents alike have, it seems to me, failed adequately to understand it.