amazon.de wurde im letzten Monat von mehr als 1.000.000 Nutzern besucht
Erhalten auf Amazon Angebote für why marx was right im Bereich englische Bücher. Entdecken tausende Produkte. Lesen Kundenbewertungen und finde Bestseller
Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Written for laypeople, Why Marx Was Right outlines ten objections to Marxism that they may hold and aims to refute each one in turn. These include arguments that Marxism is irrelevant owing to changing social classes in the modern world, that it is deterministic and utopian , and that Marxists oppose all reforms and believe in an ...
Eagleton defends Marx's ideas against ten common criticisms and argues that he was right enough of the time about enough important issues to make calling oneself a Marxist a reasonable self-description. He also provides a clear introduction to Marx's thought for those unfamiliar with his work.
10. Apr. 2018 · A Yale University Press publication that defends Marx's relevance and influence in the contemporary world. The book covers topics such as capitalism, ideology, culture, politics, and religion from a Marxist perspective.
- Terry Eagleton
- April 10, 2018
1. Juli 2011 · Eagleton challenges the common objections to Marxism and defends its relevance in a world of capitalist crises. He argues that Marxism is not tyrannical, reductionist, deterministic, or outdated, but a powerful critique of capitalism and a vision of a better society.
- (4,8K)
- Hardcover
- Terry Eagleton
13. Dez. 2012 · 2.2K. 138K views 11 years ago. Once the darling of the intelligentsia, Marxism has been out of fashion for at least a couple of decades. Philosopher and critic Terry Eagleton makes the case for...
- 24 Min.
- 142,4K
- The Institute of Art and Ideas
20. Mai 2011 · These are not the arguments of straw men, but substantial intellectual and political objections: Marxism imposes limits on human freedom; it is violent and undemocratic; it is obsessed with an...
In this pamphlet, Terry Eagleton refutes the most common political, ideological and philosophical arguments against Marx's Marxism, while giving his own view on the way of the world and mankind. His polemic diatribe is far less fanatical than the attacks of Marx's enemies.
