Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression (French: Mal d'Archive: Une Impression Freudienne) is a book by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida. It was first published in 1995 by Éditions Galilée, based on a lecture Derrida gave at a conference, Memory: The Question of the Archives, organised by the Freud Museum in 1994.
19. Feb. 2018 · A key reference point for recent analyses of archival technologies is the work of Jacques Derrida, in particular his Archive Fever. This difficult essay – originally a lecture delivered by Derrida in 1994 under the title ‘The Concept of the Archive: A Freudian Impression’ – is significant because it calls for a rethinking of ...
Now the principle of the internal division of the Freudian gesture, and thus of the Freudianconcept of the archive, is that at the moment when psychoanalysisformalizes the conditions of archive fever and of the archive itself, it repeatsthe very thing it resists or which it makes its object. It raises the stakes.
Archive Fever. A Freudian Impression. Jacques Derrida. Translated by Eric Prenowitz. In Archive Fever, Jacques Derrida deftly guides us through an extended meditation on remembrance, religion, time, and technology—fruitfully occasioned by a deconstructive analysis of the notion of archiving.
Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. In this work, Jacques Derrida guides the reader through an extended meditation on remembrance, religion, time, and technology - all occasioned by a deconstructive analysis of the notion of archiving.
This article reads Derridas Archive Fever (1995) as a sustained reflection on the influence of psychoanalysis on deconstruction. It examines the text's deployment of two financial figures - debt and inheritance - as contrasting ways of coming to terms with the intellectual legacy of psychoanalysis.
1. Jan. 2001 · Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Jacques Derrida, Eric Prenowitz (Translator) 3.77. 993 ratings84 reviews. In Archive Fever , Jacques Derrida deftly guides us through an extended meditation on remembrance, religion, time, and technology—fruitfully occasioned by a deconstructive analysis of the notion of archiving.
