Yahoo Suche Web Suche

  1. amazon.de wurde im letzten Monat von mehr als 1.000.000 Nutzern besucht

    Bei uns finden Sie zahlreiche Produkte von namhaften Herstellern auf Lager. Große Auswahl an englischsprachigen Büchern aus der Kategorie Biografien & Erinnerungen.

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Charles Hodge (* 27. Dezember 1797 in Philadelphia; † 19. Juni 1878 in Princeton) war ein US-amerikanischer Theologe der Presbyterianischen Kirche und 1822 bis 1877 Professor am Princeton Theological Seminary der Princeton University .

  2. Charles Hodge (December 27, 1797 – June 19, 1878) was a Reformed Presbyterian theologian and principal of Princeton Theological Seminary between 1851 and 1878. He was a leading exponent of the Princeton Theology, an orthodox Calvinist theological tradition in America during the 19th century.

  3. Charles Hodge (born Dec. 27, 1797, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.—died June 19, 1878, Princeton, N.J.) was a conservative American biblical scholar and a leader of the “Princeton School” of Reformed, or Calvinist, theology. Hodge graduated from Princeton University in 1815.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  4. 27. Dez. 2016 · Learn about the life and legacy of Charles Hodge, the most influential American theologian of the 19th century. He defended Calvinist doctrine, resisted revivalism, and engaged with contemporary challenges.

  5. A classic work of reformed theology by a prominent Princeton theologian. The first volume covers the study of God, theology proper, and introduces the main themes of the system.

  6. Charles Hodges American context and Reformed identity illustrate the persistence and change of Reformed ideas in nineteenth century America. Self-consciously, he sought to defend and transmit Reformed orthodoxy into an American context.

  7. 11. Mai 2011 · A review of Paul Gutjahr's biography of Charles Hodge, a prominent Reformed theologian and professor at Princeton Theological Seminary. The review praises the book's readability and insight, but criticizes its brevity, lack of citations, and misleading claim on inerrancy.