Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
1. Apr. 2003 · This article, however, focuses on the ethics and politics of Plato’s Republic. For more on what the Republic says about knowledge and its objects, see Plato: middle period metaphysics and epistemology , and for more about the discussion of the poets, see Plato: rhetoric and poetry .
- Plato on Utopia
The Laws is one of Plato’s last dialogues. In it, he...
- Aristotle’s Ethics
1. Preliminaries. Aristotle wrote two ethical treatises: the...
- Plato on Utopia
1. Apr. 2003 · About the SEP. Special Characters. This is a file in the archives of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Plato's Ethics and Politics in The Republic. First published Tue Apr 1, 2003; substantive revision Mon Aug 31, 2009. Plato's Republic centers on a simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust?
26. Apr. 2024 · The Republic, one of the most important dialogues of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, renowned for its detailed expositions of political and ethical justice and its account of the organization of the ideal state (or city-state )—hence the traditional title of the work.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Given the two central questions of the discussion, Plato’s philosophical concerns in the dialogue are ethical and political. In order to address these two questions, Socrates and his interlocutors construct a just city in speech, the Kallipolis .
16. Sept. 2003 · Plato’s Ethics: An Overview. First published Tue Sep 16, 2003; substantive revision Wed Feb 1, 2023. Like most other ancient philosophers, Plato maintains a virtue-based eudaemonistic conception of ethics.
Eric Brown. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( 2008 ) Copy BIBTEX. Abstract. Plato's Republic centers on a simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? The puzzles in Book One prepare for this question, and Glaucon and Adeimantus make it explicit at the beginning of Book Two.
4. Okt. 2019 · The Republic is among Plato’s most complex works. From its title, the first-time reader will expect a dialogue about political theory, yet the work starts from the perspective of the individual, coming to focus on the question of how, if at all, justice contributes to an agent’s happiness.