Wir haben verschiedene Bücher von Hunderten namhafter Autoren für Sie auf Lager. Entdecke eine große Auswahl an Sachbüchern. Jetzt online bestellen!
Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
1. Nov. 2015 · Althusser’s Dramaturgy and the Critique of Ideology. differences (2015) 26 (3): 1–22. An important part of the new interest for the work of Louis Althusser (1918–1990) has focused on his interpretation of “materialist theater,” as proposed in a famous essay from 1962. This is, in fact, hardly separable from discussing again the ...
13. Apr. 2016 · There are three main points that Althusser makes about this process of becoming subjects-in-ideology. 1. We are born into subject-hood – if only because we’re named before we’re born; hence we’re always already subjects. The acquisition of language is the process of becoming a subject, for both Althusser and Lacan. 2.
Marx does not view ideology as a feature of all societies, and, in particular, maintains that it will not be a feature of a future communist society. However, ideology is portrayed as a feature of all class-divided societies, and not only of capitalist society—although many of Marx’s comments on ideology are concerned with the latter.
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"> <P>If you can only see these words, then you require a newer version of your web browser, one that is capable of viewing frames.</P> </BODY>
2. Juni 2016 · Althusser continues by arguing for the “duplicate mirror structure of ideology,” which simultaneously ensures: (1) the interpellation of “individuals” as subjects; (2) their subjection to the Subject; (3) the mutual recognition of subjects and the Subject, the subjects’ recognition of each other and finally the subject’s recognition of himself; (4) the absolute guarantee that ...
Louis Althusser. Verso, 1984 - ... example existence exploitation express fact field forced formations Freud function give human idea Ideological State Apparatuses ideology imaginary important individuals International ISAs John Lewis knowledge labour l ...
15. Jan. 2024 · Althusser’s concept of the ideological state apparatus highlights the pervasive nature of ideology in society and its role in maintaining the existing power relations. By understanding how these institutions function as ideological apparatuses, we can critically analyze the ways in which dominant ideologies are transmitted and perpetuated.
