Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Henry S. Richardson earned graduate degrees in law and in public policy at Harvard before getting his Ph.D. there (under John Rawls) in 1986. Dr. Richardsons work centers on practical reasoning in all of its many guises: in the reasoning of individuals about their aims, in the democratic reasoning of citizens about public policy, and in our moral reasoning.

  2. “Measurement, Pleasure, and Practical Science in Plato’s Protagoras”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 28(1): 7–32 (1990). “Commensurability as a Prerequisite of Rational Choice: An Examination of Sidgwick's Position” , History of Philosophy Quarterly 8(2): 181–197 (1991).

  3. 29. Sept. 2017 · Share. Henry Hobson Richardson (29 September 1838 – 27 April 1886) was known across North America as the father of the Romanesque Revival. Although he only lived to age 47, Richardson is revered ...

  4. Many of Richardsons sculptures are hollow, allowing light to penetrate the work from every angle, immediately drawing viewers to the idea of looking beyond the chiseled surface. Like British sculptor Anish Kapoor (b. 1954) Richardson understands the power of the void and utilizes empty space to his advantage, allowing for expression rather than explanation. The elaborate sculptural ...

  5. Abstract. Martha Nussbaum has powerfully argued in Frontiers ofJustice and elsewhere that John Rawls’s sort of social-contract theory cannot usefully be deployed to deal with issues pertaining to justice for the disabled. To counter this claim, this article deploys Rawls’s sort of social-contract theory in order to deal with issues ...

  6. Henry S. Richardson earned graduate degrees in law and in public policy at Harvard before getting his Ph.D. there (under John Rawls) in 1986. Dr. Richardsons work centers on practical reasoning ...

  7. Henry Richardson argues that we can determine our ends rationally. He constructs a rich and original theory of how we can reason about our final goals. Richardson defuses the counter-arguments for the limits of rational deliberation, and develops interesting ideas about how his model might be extended to interpersonal deliberation of ends ...