Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters on JSTOR. Journals and books. David D. Friedman. Copyright Date: 2000. Published by: Princeton University Press. Pages: 344. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hr06. Select all. (For EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley) (For BibTex) Front Matter. (pp. [i]- [vi]) Front Matter. (pp. [i]- [vi])

    • David D. Friedman
  2. "[Friedman] explains what economics has to do with law and why it matters. . . . Applying economics to law matters because it yields efficient outcomes. In a world of finite resources and a world in which the political process controls the distribution scheme, increasing the size of the societal pie will increase the size of the slice we all ...

  3. Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters Taschenbuch – Illustriert, 2. Juli 2001. Englisch Ausgabe von David D. Friedman (Autor) 4,4 41 Sternebewertungen. Alle Formate und Editionen anzeigen. What does economics have to do with law? Suppose legislators propose that armed robbers receive life imprisonment.

    • (42)
  4. 2. Aug. 2022 · 2000. Topics. Economics, Law, Law -- Economic aspects, Droit -- Aspect économique, Économie politique, economics, 86.03 theory and methodology of law, Recht, Wirtschaft, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Rechtseconomie, Direito, Economia, Droit public économique. Publisher.

  5. Princeton University Press, 2000 - Business & Economics - 329 pages. What does economics have to do with law? Suppose legislators propose that armed robbers receive life imprisonment....

  6. Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters | Semantic Scholar. DOI: 10.5860/choice.38-1047. Corpus ID: 152495934. Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters. D. Friedman. Published 2000. Law, Economics. Introduction 3 1. What Does Economics Have to Do with Law? 8 2. Efficiency and All that 18 3.

  7. 2. Juli 2001 · What does economics have to do with law? Suppose legislators propose that armed robbers receive life imprisonment. Editorial pages applaud them for getting tough on crime. Constitutional lawyers raise the issue of cruel and unusual punishment. Legal philosophers ponder questions of justness. An economist, on the other hand, observes that making the punishment for armed robbery the same as that ...