Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Language. French. Budget. $483,675. Comfort and Indifference ( French: Le confort et l'indifférence) is a 1982 documentary film by Denys Arcand, offering an analysis of the 1980 Quebec referendum, in which "sovereignty-association" was defeated as a first step to eventual secession from Canada.
109. Synopsis. Made shortly after the referendum on Quebec’s independence was held, this documentary illustrates what the politicians’ promises were and how the population did not really care nor truly understand what was really at stake, even though just about everyone had an opinion on the subject. Synopsis.
8. Aug. 2006 · Von Denys Arcand. Mit Jean-Pierre Ronfard, Raymond Barre, Monique Bégin, Pierre Brodeur, Maurice Chaillot und Reggie Chartrand.
- Denys Arcand
- Jean-Pierre Ronfard
1991 1 h 48 min 52 sec Film: Documentary. G. Direction: Denys Arcand. Production: Roger Frappier Jean Dansereau. English sub-titled version of a film showing facts and opinions that lead to the Québec referendum on independence in 1980, with the participation of a historical character: Machiavelli. Availability. Watch on NFB.ca Rent Buy DVD.
1991 1 h 48 min. English sub-titled version of a film showing facts and opinions that lead to the Québec referendum on independence in 1980, with the participation of a historical character: Machiavelli. VISIONNER. Suggestions. Détails. Éducation. Acheter. Le confort et l'indifférence. Denys Arcand 1981 1 h 48 min. Québec : Duplessis et après...
Comfort and Indifference is a Documentary directed by Denys Arcand. Year: 1982. Original title: Le confort et l'indifférence. Synopsis: Made shortly after the referendum on Quebec's independence was held, this documentary illustrates what the politicians' promises were and how the population did not really care nor truly understand ...You can ...
Made shortly after the referendum on Quebec's independence was held, this documentary illustrates what the politicians' promises were and how the population did not really care nor truly understand what was really at stake, even though just about everyone had an opinion on the subject.
