Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
I'm working on a text and need to tell the users about the differences of certain options. I'm struggling between with and within and don't know which is the correct one for: With this option...
14. März 2017 · Adverbials of manner tell you how or in what way something is done. However, as Davo notes, they carry different shades of meaning. "With" is more neutral than "in", as with would be more likely to be used if there is no surprise, and in makes it seem more remarkable. You can also indicate that you consider it remarkable by adding the word ...
7. Juni 2021 · 2. 'to' is directed towards only one person, whereas, 'with' includes both people. Example: John was talking to Smith. John was speaking with Smith. In the first sentence, only John is speaking. In the second sentence, a conversation of two people is implied. Share.
9. Jan. 2018 · 4. Where the cause of disappointment is a person, we normally use in. Where the cause is a physical thing or an action/event, we're more likely to use by or with. Thus, for OP's first example context, "I was disappointed by my result" is the most common form. There's nothing wrong with with there, but in is unlikely.
10. März 2013 · Oct 9, 2013. #6. Hello Learnathon. I'd say that "if I updated you on my schedule" would mean "if I gave you the latest information on my schedule", whereas "if I updated you with my schedule" would mean "if I gave you the latest information on what I'm doing by giving you my [current] schedule". Of the two, I would expect "on" rather than "with".
I am having some questions regarding the count on and count with usages. I believe count with should be used when I'm telling something like: I can count with my fingers.
24. Apr. 2017 · Here are some example sentences listed at dictionary.com and Merriam-Webster. In each example I have marked which of the two above meanings (1 or 2) are being used, and I have also emphasized the preposition following correction in bold.
9. Okt. 2018 · You probably put to much stress on this or that, however the issue is somewhere else: All three phrases seem to me (!) to translate the same, albeit 'With that said' / 'That being said' does not negate a preceding statement, whereas 'Having said that' does.
1. Mai 2013 · England (aged 79) UK English. May 1, 2013. #3. C ontribute is a transitive verb and is not used with with. This is how I use it. But it can also be used intransitively, in the sense of making a contribution in the form of something. Whether you use it with with or not is then a question of style. Example:
Mike Philip. 1,095 7 37 62. If it can be an option that is not out of the four you gave us, "compatible with" is a better fit. – Caroffrey. May 29, 2019 at 5:29. Except for missing "do" any of those sentences could be correct but mean different things. The first two imply the parts work but aren't ideal. The second two imply the parts don't ...
