Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Bal Gangadhar Tilak (pronunciation ⓘ; born Keshav Gangadhar Tilak (pronunciation: [keʃəʋ ɡəŋɡaːd̪ʱəɾ ʈiɭək]); 23 July 1856 – 1 August 1920), endeared as Lokmanya (IAST: Lokamānya), was an Indian nationalist, teacher, and an independence activist. He was one third of the Lal Bal Pal triumvirate.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak ( Marathi: बाळ गंगाधर टिळक Bāḷ Gaṅgādhar Ṭiḷak; * 23. Juli 1856 in Chikhli; † 1. August 1920 in Bombay) zählte zu den bedeutendsten Politikern Indiens während des Unabhängigkeitskampfes. Sein Beitrag lag in dessen Aktivierung und Dynamisierung und nicht so sehr in konstitutioneller Arbeit.
11. Apr. 2024 · Bal Gangadhar Tilak, scholar, mathematician, philosopher, and ardent nationalist who helped lay the foundation for India’s independence by building his own defiance of British rule into a national movement. Mahatma Gandhi called him ‘the Maker of Modern India.’. Learn more about Tilak’s life in this article.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak was an Indian social reformer and freedom activist. He was one of the prime architects of modern India and probably the strongest advocates of Swaraj or Self Rule for India. His famous declaration “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it” served as an inspiration for future revolutionaries during India’s struggle ...
Bal Gangadhar Tilak, (born July 23, 1856, Ratnagiri, India—died Aug. 1, 1920, Bombay), Indian scholar and nationalist. Born to a middle-class Brahman family, Tilak taught mathematics and in 1884 founded the Deccan Education Society to help educate the masses. Through two weekly newspapers, he voiced his criticisms of British rule in India ...
29. Mai 2018 · TILAK, BAL GANGADHAR (1856 – 1920), was an Indian political leader. Known by his followers as Lokamanya, "revered by the people, " but as the "father of Indian unrest" by the British authorities in India, Tilak had a crucial role in defining Indian nationalism by an appeal to Hindu religious and cultural symbols.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak (b. 1856–d. 1920) has been one of the Indian freedom movement’s more contentious leaders. Debates then as now have focused on questions about his brand of Hinduism, his views on violence and its relationship with history, and his involvement in the nationalist movement and the politics of identity.
