Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Critique of Dialectical Reason (French: Critique de la raison dialectique) is a 1960 book by the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, in which the author further develops the existentialist Marxism he first expounded in his essay Search for a Method (1957).
- Jean Paul Sartre, Arlette Elkaïm-Sartre, Quintin Hoare
- 835 (English ed., vol. 1), 467 (English ed., vol. 2)
- 1960
- 1960 (vol. 1), 1985 (vol. 2)
19. Sept. 2022 · I argue that a compelling and fruitful organization theory lurks in the Critique of Dialectical Reason with respect to (at least) three key topics: power/resistance, management hierarchies and technology. I outline the contours of this Sartrean organization theory and present implications and avenues for future inquiry.
Aronson accuses Sartre of failing to provide a foundation for historical materialism and common action, and of falling into a circular and empty dialectic. He argues that Sartre should have started from the notion of society and the social whole, instead of individual praxis and need.
12. Dez. 2020 · Critique of Dialectical Reason is the product of a later stage in Sartre's thinking, during which he no longer identified Marxism with the Soviet Union or French Communism but came closer to identifying as a Marxist.
5. Juni 2012 · 3 - The Critique of Dialectical Reason. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012. Joseph S. Catalano. Chapter. Get access. Cite. Summary. We experience history first in our cribs and then through the artifacts of our home and our culture.
Critique of Dialectical Reason. Jean-Paul Sartre. 1960. The Fused Group. The group — the equivalence of freedom as necessity and of. necessity as freedom — the scope and limits of any realist dialectic. 1 The Genesis of Groups. As we have seen, the necessity of the group is not present a priori in a gathering.
Sartre argues that dialectical Reason is the intelligibility of being and knowledge, and that it manifests itself as a totalisation. He criticizes positivist Reason for being unintelligible and opaque, and proposes a critical investigation of dialectical Reason based on human relations.
