Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Henry Havelock Ellis (* 2. Februar 1859 in Croydon; † 8. Juli 1939 in Hintlesham, Suffolk) war ein britischer Sexualforscher, Sozialreformer und Fabianer . Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Leben. 2 Schriften (Auswahl) 2.1 Deutschsprachige Übersetzungen. 2.2 Französischsprachige Übersetzungen (Auswahl) 3 Literatur. 4 Weblinks. Leben.
Henry Havelock Ellis (2 February 1859 – 8 July 1939) was an English-French physician, eugenicist, writer, progressive intellectual and social reformer who studied human sexuality. He co-wrote the first medical textbook in English on homosexuality in 1897, and also published works on a variety of sexual practices and inclinations ...
- 1879−1931
Havelock Ellis (born Feb. 2, 1859, Croydon, Surrey, Eng.—died July 8, 1939, Washbrook, Suffolk) was an English essayist and physician who studied human sexual behaviour and challenged Victorian taboos against public discussion of the subject.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
6. März 2024 · Henry Havelock Ellis (1859–1939), the English sexologist, should be ranked among the prominent, late-19th-century defenders of Darwinian evolution, a designation usually reserved for a small number of his contemporary naturalists.
Havelock Ellis (Henry Havelock Ellis, 1859–1939) was a British sexologist who authored the first medical textbook in English on homosexuality in 1897. Ellis was born in Croydon, the son of a sea captain, and attended schools in Wimbledon and Mitcham.
14. Mai 2024 · Havelock Ellis. (1859—1939) writer and sexologist. Quick Reference. (1859–1939) British writer and physician whose studies of human sexual behaviour had considerable influence on contemporary views of sex and helped to bring about more open discussion of sexual problems and sex education.
Havelock Ellis, Geschlecht und Gesellschaft. Grundzüge der Soziologie des Geschlechtslebens. In: Mohr A (ed.) Band 9 1911–1915: Leitfaden einer Vorlesung über theoretische Nationalökonomie. Englische Weltpolitik in englischer Beleuchtung. Schriften. Rezensionen. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2000. p.591-599. https://doi.org/10.1515 ...
