Yahoo Suche Web Suche

  1. Entdecken tausende Produkte. Lesen Kundenbewertungen und finde Bestseller. Erhalten auf Amazon Angebote für jonathan dancy im Bereich englische Bücher

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Jonathan Peter Dancy FBA (born 8 May 1946) is a British philosopher, who has written on ethics and epistemology. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at University of Texas at Austin and Research Professor at the University of Reading. He taught previously for many years at the University of Keele .

  2. Professor Dancy is the author of An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, Moral Reasons, Berkeley: An Introduction, Practical Reality, and Ethics Without Principles, as well as articles on many philosophical subjects.

  3. I am Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin, where I teach a short graduate class in the second semester each academic year. Research Interests. My dominating interest was originally in moral theory.

    • 471-2620
    • Professor
    • jdancy@austin.utexas.edu
  4. 28. März 2018 · Jonathan Dancy, being the contemporary founding father of particularism, provides the most influential, if not the most definitive, statement of the doctrine in Dancy 2009. Väyrynen 2011 offers a balanced analysis of the pros and the cons of particularism, whereas Crisp 1998 takes a somewhat disparaging view about it.

  5. 24. Sept. 2014 · During the last three decades, Jonathan Dancy's work has opened up new avenues in many areas of philosophy. Seven of the fourteen papers in this volume relate in one way or another to Dancy's influential work on particularism in ethics and holism about reasons, and with one exception, they are all largely sympathetic.

    • Jonas Olson
    • 2014
  6. Bei der Frage, aus welchen Arten von Gründen wir handeln, spricht sich Jonathan Dancy klar für eine nonpsychologistische Betrachtungsweise aus: für ihn bestehen Gründe niemals (oder nur in Ausnahmefällen) aus mentalen Zuständen des Handelnden. Es

  7. Jonathan Dancy aims to establish the possibility of reasoning to action, by showing how similar it is to reasoning to belief. He offers a general theory of reasoning, which smoothly admits the differences there may be between the two types, while also considering the possibility of reasoning to hope, to fear, to doubt, and to intention.