Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Dieses von Peter Lely erstellte Porträt zeigt höchstwahrscheinlich Joseph Dudley. Unterschrift von Dudley. Joseph Dudley (* 23. September 1647 in Roxbury, Massachusetts Bay Colony; † 2. April 1720 in Roxbury, Province of Massachusetts Bay) war ein englischer Kolonialverwalter in Neuengland. Er war der Sohn eines der Gründer ...
Joseph Dudley (September 23, 1647 – April 2, 1720) was a colonial administrator, a native of Roxbury in Massachusetts Bay Colony, and the son of one of its founders. He had a leading role in the administration of the Dominion of New England (1686–1689), which was overthrown in the 1689 Boston revolt .
- Paul Dudley
- Sir Edmund Andros (as governor of the Dominion of New England)
- Simon Bradstreet (as governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony)
Joseph Dudley (* 23. September 1647 in Roxbury , Massachusetts Bay Colony ; † 2. April 1720 in Roxbury, Province of Massachusetts Bay ) war ein englischer Kolonialverwalter in Neuengland .
Our story of Cotton Mather and Joseph Dudley begins in 1686. Cotton Mather has just assumed leadership of the Second Church of Boston, lifting the burden from his father, Increase, just named president of Harvard College. Cotton Mather. Increase Mather was one of the most powerful Puritan ministers of his day.
Joseph Dudley, the first Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court of Judicature, was born in Roxbury, Massachusetts on September 23, 1647. The fourth son of Thomas Dudley, Governor of Massachusetts, he was educated at the Free School in Cambridge and graduated from Harvard College in 1665.
Joseph Dudley (September 23, 1647 – April 2, 1720) was a colonial administrator, a native of Roxbury in Massachusetts Bay Colony, and the son of one of its founders. He had a leading role in the administration of the Dominion of New England (1686–1689), which was overthrown in the 1689 Boston revolt.
A 1705 legal case pitting Governor Joseph Dudley (1647-1720) of Massachusetts against two cart drivers, whom the governor charged with insubordination, offers a vivid example of the mounting challenges to social deference. This case became a landmark in limiting the authority of public officials.
