Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. Sandel locates modern liberalism in the tradition of Kant, and focuses on its most influential recent expression in the work of John Rawls. In the most ...
- Michael J. Sandel
- 1982
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982; second edition 1998) is a book about liberalism by the philosopher Michael Sandel. The work helped start the liberalism-communitarianism debate that dominated Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s.
- Michael J. Sandel
- 231
- 1982
- 1982
16. Aug. 2016 · Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. ( 2nd Edition 1998) . Cambridge University Press. Download Citation. Abstract: “His is a new and authentic philosophical voice…. Michael Sandel’s elegantly argued book…describes what I take to be the reality of moral experience.” – Michael Walzer, The New Republic.
Limits of Justice over the long run.'8 The deontologist, as Sandel suggests, disagrees not so much with this conception of the good, but rather with the attempt to base a theory of rights upon it. For the deontological liberal, the satisfaction of desires has value only if those desires reflect an individual's freedom and autonomy. Thus, a ...
18. März 2021 · Liberalism and the limits of justice : Sandel, Michael J : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. by. Sandel, Michael J. Publication date. 1998. Topics. Justice, Liberalism, Libéralisme, Gerechtigkeit, Liberalismus, Liberalisme, Rechtvaardigheid, Filosofische aspecten, Justice sociale, Libéralisme (philosophie) Publisher.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. N. Care, Michael J. Sandel. Published 1 September 1985. Philosophy, Political Science. Noûs. A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends.
Die Folgerung von Sandel lautet, dass aus der Sicht lich unabhängigen Selbst das Differenzprinzip von Rawls nicht als angesehen werden kann. Die Bereitschaft zum Teilen, die Sandel als unitarier befürwortet, bedürfe eines stärkeren moralischen Fundaments, die liberale Vorstellung von unserer Person liefern könne.
