Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Louis Veuillot (11 October 1813 – 7 March 1883) was a French journalist and author who helped to popularize ultramontanism (a philosophy favoring Papal supremacy). Career overview. Veuillot was born of humble parents in Boynes ( Loiret ). When he was five years of age, his parents relocated to Paris.
- French
- Eugène Veuillot (brother), François Veuillot (brother)
- Journalist, writer
- Mathilde
Louis Veuillot, né à Boynes le 11 octobre 1813 et mort à Paris le 7 avril 1883 [1], est un journaliste et homme de lettres français. Catholique passionné, il défend avec vigueur l'enseignement privé et reprend le journal L'Univers, qu'il dirige avec son frère Eugène Veuillot.
12. Apr. 2024 · Louis Veuillot (born October 11, 1813, Boynes, France—died March 7, 1883, Paris) was an author and leader within France of extreme Ultramontanism, a movement advocating absolute papal supremacy. The son of poor parents, Veuillot early began writing for periodicals and developed his talents in provincial journalism.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Biographie de LOUIS VEUILLOT (1813-1883). Fils d'un tonnelier, et toute sa vie demeuré fidèle à ses origines populaires, Louis Veuillot a été en France le véritable fondateur du journalisme catholique, auquel il contribua à donner son goût durable pour la polémique, en un temps , il est...
Louis Veuillot was one of these children. His activities as editor of conservative provincial papers supporting the regime of Louis. Philippe (and, therefore, opposing republicans as well as adherents of the legitimate Bourbon dynasty) were so successful that he advanced after 1836 to membership on the editorial staff of Parisian publica.
Overview. Louis Veuillot. (1813—1883) Quick Reference. (1813–83), Ultramontane French journalist. In 1843 he became editor of L'Univers, a newspaper which gained an international significance through his defence of the Church.
France was the crusading journalist Louis Veuillot (1813-1883), editor of the newspaper L'Univers . Veuillot is now something of an obscure fig-ure, relegated from history (except as a bogeyman) not only by republi-can historiography but also by a liberal Catholic historiography which
