Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Shown are the GNOME desktop environment, the GNU Emacs text editor, the GIMP image editor, and the VLC media player. Free software, libre software, or libreware [1] [2] is computer software distributed under terms that allow users to run the software for any purpose as well as to study, change, and distribute it and any adapted versions.
The Academic Free License ( AFL) is a permissive free software license written in 2002 by Lawrence E. Rosen, a former general counsel of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). The license grants similar rights to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses – licenses allowing the software to be made proprietary – but was written to correct ...
A Permissive software license, sometimes also called BSD-like or BSD-style license, [2] is a FOSS software license with minimal requirements about how the software can be redistributed. Well-known examples of permissive free software licenses include the MIT License, BSD licenses and the Apache license. As of 2015, the most popular FOSS license ...
Permissive licenses come from academia. Copyleft licenses come from the free software movement. Copyleft licenses require derivative works to be distributed with the source code and under a similar license. Since the mid-2000s, courts in multiple countries have upheld the terms of both types of license. Software developers have filed cases both ...
Pages in category "Permissive software licenses" The following 24 pages are in this category, out of 24 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. A. Academic Free License; Apache License; Apache License 2.0; Apache License 2.0 wit ...
Eine Freizügige Open-Source-Lizenz (englischer Originalbegriff Permissive licence) ist eine Open-Source-Lizenz, die eine breitere Wiederverwertung von lizenzierten Inhalten erlaubt als strenge Copyleft-Lizenzen wie die GNU General Public License (GPL). Eine solche Lizenz bietet viele derselben Eigenschaften, die auch andere Open-Source-Lizenzen bieten. Im Gegensatz zu nicht-freizügigen ...
It has the virtue of brevity, even by permissive-license standards but not much else, and in particular isn't actually very widely used as a permissive software license. I would replace it out of hand, probably with the MIT license (as apparently the most widely-used permissive license in practice), but there seems to have been some controversy about it in the past.
