Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
When I wrote The Population Bomb in 1968, there were 3.5 billion people. Since then we've added another 2.8 billion -- many more than the total population (2 billion) when I was born in 1932. If that's not a population explosion, what is? My basic claims (and those of the many scientific colleagues who reviewed my work) were that population ...
- Paul R. Ehrlich
- United States
- 1968
- 201
Driving the criticism of The Population Bomb were its arresting, graphic descriptions of the potential consequences of overpopulation: famine, pollution, social and ecological collapse. Ehrlich...
In the world population debate, the general concerns involve mainly three interconnected consequences of the population explosion: 1) the growing poverty in the world and famine; 2) the exhaustion and pollution of natural resources essential to human survival; and 3) the migration pressure from the poor South to the rich North (Van Bavel, 2004).
- J. Van BaVel
- Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013; 5(4): 281-291.
- 2013
- 2013
31. Mai 2015 · 723. In the 1960s, fears of overpopulation sparked campaigns for population control. But whatever became of the population bomb? Rajanish Kakade/Associated Press. By Clyde Haberman. May 31,...
- 13 Min.
- Clyde Haberman
22. März 2018 · Interview. Paul Ehrlich: 'Collapse of civilisation is a near certainty within decades' Damian Carrington. Fifty years after the publication of his controversial book The Population Bomb,...
27. Apr. 2018 · In 1968, the best-seller “The Population Bomb,” written by Paul and Anne Ehrlich (but credited solely to Paul) warned of the perils of overpopulation: mass starvation, societal upheaval, environmental deterioration. The book was criticized at the time for painting an overly dark picture of the future.
10. Juli 2018 · “The Population Bomb” created more space to hold radical views on population matters, but its impact was fleeting, and maybe even harmful to the population movement. By the early 1970s, many...
