Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Ralph Barton Perry (* 3. Juli 1876 in Poultney, Vermont; † 22. Januar 1957 in Boston, Massachusetts) war ein US-amerikanischer Philosoph . Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Leben. 2 Werk. 3 Weblinks. 4 Einzelnachweise. Leben. Ralph Barton Perry studierte an der Princeton University, wo er 1896 seinen Abschluss mit einem Bachelor machte.
Biography. Bibliography. See also. References. External links. Ralph Barton Perry (July 3, 1876 – January 22, 1957) was an American philosopher. He was a strident moral idealist who stated in 1909 that, to him, idealism meant "to interpret life consistently with ethical, scientific, and metaphysical truth."
1. Apr. 2024 · Ralph Barton Perry was an American educator and philosopher noted as the founder of the school of new realism in American pragmatic philosophy. Educated at a private school in Philadelphia and at Princeton (A.B., 1896) and Harvard (M.A., 1897; Ph.D., 1899) universities, Perry began a teaching.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
3. Nov. 2022 · This paper examines Ralph Barton Perry's analysis of the ‘ego-centric predicament’. It will be shown that Perry convincingly argued against prevailing contemporary versions of idealism and that it makes perfectly good sense to consider him a precursor of subsequent trends in American analytic philosophy.
Ralph Barton Perry, the American realist philosopher, was born in Poultney, Vermont. He attended Princeton University, where he received his B.A. in 1896; he received his M.A. from Harvard in 1897 and his Ph.D. in 1899. For a brief period he taught at Williams and Smith colleges.
1. Okt. 2013 · Perry, Ralph Barton. General Theory of Value: Its Meaning and Basic Principles Construed in Terms of Interest. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, 1954. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674430396
RALPH BARTON PERRY, General Theory of Value. 101 which is quite unmistakable in some examples (e.g., an 'evil' spirit and a ' bad' spirit), reveals a deep-seated and far-reaching ambigu-ity in the meaning of ' good' which challenges further inquiry. Moreover 'goodc' as opposed to ' bad' does not seem to be restricted to the sphere of moral ...
