Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (French: Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain) is a work by the French philosopher and mathematician Marquis de Condorcet, written in 1794 while in hiding during the French Revolution and published posthumously in 1795.

  2. 1. Juli 2004 · Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind: Tenth Epoch. Keith Michael Baker. Author and Article Information. Daedalus (2004) 133 (3): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526041504588. Cite. PDF. Permissions. Share. This content is only available as a PDF. PDF. © 2004 American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

  3. Condorcet, Keith Michael Baker, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind: Tenth Epoch, Daedalus, Vol. 133, No. 3, On Progress (Summer, 2004), pp. 65-82

  4. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind: Tenth Epoch Translated by Keith Michael Baker Translator's Note: There is still no definitive or critical edition of Condorcet's "Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progr?s de l'esprit humain," or of the other parts of the work for which it was intended as an introduction. The

  5. 25. Feb. 2009 · Sketch for an historical picture of the progress of the human mind. Translated by June Barraclough, with an introduction by Stuart Hampshire. (Weidenfeld and Nicholson. 1955. Pp. xvi + 202. 12s. 6d.) | Philosophy | Cambridge Core. > Condorcet.

  6. DOI: 10.1017/s0003055400297293. Corpus ID: 191112495. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. M. Condorcet. Published in American Political Science… 1 September 1955. Political Science, History, Psychology. View on Cambridge Press. Save to Library. Create Alert. Cite. 252 Citations. Citation Type. More Filters.

  7. Marquis de Condorcet. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. (1794) If man can, with almost complete assurance, predict phenomena when he knows their laws ... why, then, should it be regarded as a fantastic undertaking to sketch, with some pretense to truth, the future destiny of man on the basis of his history?