Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
Vor 8 Stunden · v. t. e. The European debt crisis, often also referred to as the eurozone crisis or the European sovereign debt crisis, was a multi-year debt crisis that took place in the European Union (EU) from 2009 until the mid to late 2010s. Several eurozone member states ( Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, and Cyprus) were unable to repay or refinance ...
Vor 8 Stunden · This reflects a defendable, yet by no means compulsory, interpretation of the outer limits of the harmonisation competence under Article 16 TFEU to be used for adopting the procedural regulation. As the Commission states in the proposal’s explanatory memorandum, the scope of the harmonised procedural rules is rather a question of proportionality.
Vor 8 Stunden · It is the starting point in any competition law assessment (be it an antitrust action under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU or merger control), and is a piece of soft law that is thumbed through, studied and assessed by competition practitioners and antitrust regulators around the world.
Vor 8 Stunden · applying Article 107(1) TFEU. This was the second time that the GC had to consider DBF’s appeal. The ECJ annulled the first judgment and referred the case back to the GC. In this blog, I will focus on the State aid assessment that the GC carried out “for the sake of completeness” (point 46). The GC had already
Vor 8 Stunden · Replacement of CELEX identifiers by short titles - experimental feature. It replaces clickable CELEX identifiers of treaties and case-law by short titles. Visualisation of documen
Vor 8 Stunden · On 6 February 2024, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CiArb) European Branch/French Chapter held a seminar at the Paris office of Bird & Bird moderated by Jalal El Ahdab (Bird&Bird) and Alexandre Malan (Belot Malan & Associés) on a crucial topic: Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) issues and their impact on international arbitration.
Vor 8 Stunden · In this section, two Appellate Body reports are examined, both involving the Chinese SOEs. The conclusion is that the Appellate Body adopted different treatment standards of SOEs in the two cases, thus having created clashes from within the WTO’s dispute settlement system. Section 5.5 concludes the chapter.
